Miniature Ordnance Review looks at the world of historical and fantasy miniatures wargaming and model building. From 15mm Flames of War, to Warhammer 40K, to 1/35th scale tanks, with some potential surprises on the horizon - you'll find them here!

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

The Great Plastic Debate

There was a time in the not so distant past (relatively speaking) when miniatures wargaming meant using lead figures.  The fantasy and science-fiction miniature companies used the same technology.  Then in the late 1980's, there was a concerted effort worldwide to reduce lead in consumer products because of toxicity issues with the heavy metal.  Many prominent manufacturers (like Citadel) went to a "lead free pewter."  Other manufacturers moved to a white metal alloy which still retained a small amount of lead as the absolute bans never materialized.

The new pewter alloys differed from the older high lead content miniatures in two important ways.  The metal was harder and therefore more difficult to clean up any casting flaws and mold lines.  The metal was also more expensive than the older alloys leading to across the board price increases for miniatures.  Largely because of the later issue, manufacturers began to experiment more with alternate materials for miniatures.

Companies like Battlefront, while still using metal for their small scale figures, began to use a mix of polyurethane resins and white metal for their vehicles.  The casting technology for resin is similar in many ways to metal, but resin is generally cheaper.  Plastic (both soft and hard) had been used for decades in certain scales for miniatures, but the quality of the plastic miniatures was almost universally inferior when compared to their metal counterparts.  One notable exception would be plastic vehicles from companies like Citadel which essentially used the same injection molding techniques and design used in scale model kits.

As the new century dawned, Citadel began to move away from metal all together and now use plastic not only for their vehicles, but their 28mm miniatures as well.  They have a "finecast" range that is now, interestingly, resin rather than metal.  At the smaller scales like 15mm, however, metal and resin still ruled.  The release of the Flames of War caused a surge in demand for 15mm miniatures and vehicles which had to that point been a fairly fragmented market.

With the increase in popularity of the 15mm scale, it was only a matter of time before new technology would be brought to bear into the market.  The primary drawback of injection molded plastic is that it has a very high up-front cost.  Creation of the molds for the kit sprues is expensive, and to get good detail, complex (and even more expensive) sliding molds are frequently required.  However, once the mold is created, a plastic miniature or vehicle is cheaper than its metal and/or resin counterpart.  Companies like Zvezda and Plastic Soldier Company brought plastic to 15mm figures and vehicles in a major way.

Recognizing the competitive threat, Battlefront had already started to dip its toe into injection molded plastic with the tracks for their Sherman and Sd Kfz 251 halftracks.  These were followed by the "Open Fire" boxed set featuring decent plastic infantry, but the vehicles and anti-tank guns were a bit of a mixed bag.  Since then Battlefront has continued to release plastic parts and kits.  Some have been excellent (the Panther tracks, T-34 kit, M113 kit, Sd Kfz 251 D) while others have had serious accuracy issues (Panzer IV J tracks, the Panzer IV H kit). 

The transition to plastic has not been without controversy.  Some people prefer the weight of the older metal and resin miniatures.  Others prefer the detailing possible with plastic vehicles.  Given the cost of setting up injection molds, only high volume SKU's are good candidates for conversion to plastic, which means that resin and metal are unlikely to completely go away in the near future at 15mm scale.  Resin and metal are still going to be cheaper to set up, and can in certain circumstances still offer detailing as good or better than plastic.

I personally like plastic for vehicles simply because it makes assembly and conversion easier, and as any reader of this blog understands I LOVE to do conversions.  I still have mixed feelings on the plastic figures at this point.  Some seem to have excellent detail, while others (like the tripod for the mortar in the open fire set) are crudely simplified.

So what are your thoughts on plastic vs. metal/resin miniatures?  Post in the comments below!


  1. Good post!

    I feel that the plastic vehicles will be the benchmark in the future as they are much more symmetrical and detail is crisp. As well with the 3d printing tech it will get even better. I still prefer the metal men though as plastic will not stand up to the rigours of gaming and weapons and smaller parts will eventually fail. Most of battlefronts figures are good though a little dwarfish, I prefer them to plastic offerings.

  2. Thanks! I think my age is showing just a wee bit in the post, but 'eh... da heck with it!

    I tend to agree that plastic is likely going to be better for vehicles in the long term, provided the masters for the injection molds are good. Unfortunately BF has had a couple of epic goofs so far...

  3. Tell me about it - the Schurtzen thing, the idler wheel thing, the open-fire box (everything). I do support this change for them though. Just work out the kinks!


  4. Once I got my hands on the M113 I knew they could actually "do it." Of course, now everything in my mind needs to be up to that standard. BTW - loved your faces tutorial on the FoW Gallery Board - do you have one for the rest of the figures???